Mats Bengtsson
2007-08-16 07:23:28 UTC
FYI:
Since there is (was) conflicting recommendations in XEP-0170, Recommended Order of Stream Feature Negotiation,
(SASL -> compression)
and XEP-0138, Stream Compression, (compression -> SASL),
but St Peter said 0170 is the correct one, I thought about investigating what servers say:
OpenFire 3.3.2: It accepts both ways but continue to offer SASL even after the process SASL -> compress
which it shouldn't
ejabberd 1.1.2: It only accepts compression before SASL (XEP-0138)
Mats
Since there is (was) conflicting recommendations in XEP-0170, Recommended Order of Stream Feature Negotiation,
(SASL -> compression)
and XEP-0138, Stream Compression, (compression -> SASL),
but St Peter said 0170 is the correct one, I thought about investigating what servers say:
OpenFire 3.3.2: It accepts both ways but continue to offer SASL even after the process SASL -> compress
which it shouldn't
ejabberd 1.1.2: It only accepts compression before SASL (XEP-0138)
Mats